Truth today is an evolved term that doesn't actually have that much connection to what is actually true.
In the remaining part of this series will focus on a recent interview of James Corbett framed around 9/11 Truth (and false flags), which explores what Truth means in the context of alternative thinking and will attempt to explain it basically in terms of science vs religion - is Truth really an evidence-based exploration of reality, or is it a matter of faith which provides answers that emotionally satisfy preexisting desires and vacuums of understanding?
Or is it, circling back to neoliberalism, simply a matter of what sells?